The brain-disordered defendant: neuroscience and legal insanity in the twenty-first century.

نویسنده

  • Richard E Redding
چکیده

Introduction.......................................................................................... 52 I. Frontal Lobe Brain Dysfunction (“FLD”) and Criminality......... 54 A. Causes and Symptoms of FLD................................................ 57 B. The Role of FLD in Criminal Behavior ................................. 67 II. Admissibility of FLD Evidence...................................................... 75 III. Modern Neuroscience and Legal Insanity................................... 78 A. The History of Insanity Standards in American Jurisprudence.......................................................................... 78 B. A Proposal to Revive Control Tests for Insanity.................... 85 C. Why Control Tests for Insanity are Needed........................... 89 1. Existing Cognitive Tests are Insufficient .......................... 90 a. The Possibility of More Expansive Cognitive Tests.... 93 2. Impulse Control Disorders Exist and Can Be Assessed ... 98 3. Control Tests for Insanity Do Not Threaten the Law’s Free-Will Assumption ......................................................111 Conclusion ...........................................................................................117 Appendix A. Forensic Assessment of Frontal Lobe Dysfunction (FLD)....................................................................................................119 Appendix B. States Having Control Tests for Insanity......................123

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.

A preliminary investigation of the impact of pretrial evaluations of trial competence and legal insanity, and the variables that mediate case outcomes is reported. Twenty-four percent of defendants evaluated as incompetent to stand trial were found competent by the court or were tried without the question of competence being adjudicated. Charges were dropped in more than half of the cases in wh...

متن کامل

Which Future for Neuroscience in Forensic Psychiatry: Theoretical Hurdles and Empirical Chances

NeuroscieNce Data aND ForeNsic Psychiatric examiNatioN: oPPortuNities, threats, aND LimitatioNs oF the curreNt Debate Almost all of the world’s legal systems assume that criminal responsibility cannot be established if the defendant was not capable to appreciate the wrongfulness of his/her actions (1). Furthermore, most Western Penal Codes assume that the defendant cannot be convicted if he/she...

متن کامل

Unpacking insanity defence standards: An experimental study of rationality and control tests in criminal law

The present study investigated the impact of different legal standards on mock juror decisions concerning whether a defendant was guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity. Undergraduate students (N = 477) read a simulated case summary involving a murder case and were asked to make an insanity determination. The cases differed in terms of the condition of the defendant (rationality deficit or ...

متن کامل

Impulse control and criminal responsibility: lessons from neuroscience.

Almost all of the world's legal systems recognize the "M'Naghten" exception to criminal responsibility: the inability to appreciate the wrongfulness of action. This exception rests on the assumption that punishment is morally justified only if the defendant was able to choose whether to do wrong. Jurists and jurisdictions differ, however, on whether to extend M'Naghten's logic to cases where th...

متن کامل

Criminal Law: Commitment and Release of Criminal Defendants Acquitted by Reason of Insanity

WHEN THE DEFENDANT in a criminal case is found not guilty by reason of insanity,' a proper solution to his disposition seeks to satisfy three possibly conflicting considerations. Society demands that dangerous persons be prevented from causing further harm; legal tradition demands that liberty be taken away only by due process of law5 modem scientific knowledge demands that the psychiatric aspe...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The American University law review

دوره 56 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006